By:
Ojahan M Oppusunggu
In the hospitality industry, pricing is often treated as a reaction—something to be adjusted when occupancy is low or competitors drop their rates. This mindset is widespread, accepted, and deeply flawed.
Because the moment you reduce price as a reaction to low occupancy, you are not managing revenue—
You are abandoning your strategy.
Pricing is not a tool to fix problems during operations.
Pricing is a commitment made during planning.
And that commitment must be protected.
The Critical Principle Most Hotels Get Wrong
When occupancy is low, the most common reaction is:
This feels logical. It feels safe. It feels necessary.
But in reality, it creates long-term damage:
Most importantly:
It breaks the pricing structure defined during budgeting.
The correct reaction is fundamentally different:
Do not reduce the price. Keep the price as defined in the budget.
Instead, focus on how to increase volume.
This is the discipline that separates strategic operators from reactive ones.
Pricing Is Defined Before the Game Starts
Pricing strategy is not created during operations.
It is defined during budgeting, where the hotel establishes:
At that stage, pricing is not just a number—it is a positioning decision.
Once the year begins:
Operations exist to execute, not to redesign.
Why Reducing Price Is the Wrong Reaction
Lowering price may increase short-term occupancy—but at what cost?
1. You Attract the Wrong Demand
Discounting shifts your customer base toward price-sensitive segments that:
2. You Cannibalize Future Revenue
Guests learn your pattern:
This delays bookings and weakens forward demand.
3. You Damage Market Positioning
Price is perception.
When you reduce price:
4. You Break Internal Strategy
Your budget assumed:
Discounting invalidates those assumptions.
The Correct Reaction: Increase Volume, Not Discount
If occupancy is below expectation, the question should not be:
“What price should we reduce to?”
But:
“How do we increase volume at the existing price?”
This shifts the mindset from price-driven to strategy-driven.
1. Strengthen Distribution, Not Discounting
Instead of lowering price:
The issue is often not price—it is exposure.
2. Activate Sales Efforts
Low occupancy is often a sales problem, not a pricing problem.
Actions may include:
Volume comes from effort, not just pricing.
3. Enhance Value, Not Reduce Price
If stimulation is needed:
This maintains price integrity while increasing perceived value.
4. Improve Conversion
Sometimes demand exists—but conversion is weak.
Focus on:
Do not assume price is the problem when conversion is the issue.
5. Target the Right Segments
Different segments behave differently.
If one segment is weak:
Again, this should align with the original plan—not contradict it.
The Role of Supply and Demand
Yes, supply and demand matters.
But it must be applied correctly.
This is where most hotels fail:
They use price as the first lever—when it should be the last.
When Is Price Reduction Acceptable?
There is only one valid scenario:
When the situation has moved beyond the original planning assumptions
For example:
Even then:
And importantly:
Dynamic Pricing: Discipline, Not Reaction
Dynamic pricing does not mean:
It means:
Without discipline, dynamic pricing becomes:
The Last Hours Exception
There is one operational reality:
After midnight, unsold rooms have:
At this point:
But this is not strategy—it is damage control.
And even this should be:
The Organizational Mindset Shift
To implement this principle, a shift is required:
From:
To:
From:
To:
From:
To:
The Core Discipline
Pricing strategy follows a strict hierarchy:
If any of these are reversed:
Conclusion: Protect the Price, Solve the Real Problem
Low occupancy is not a pricing problem.
It is a:
Reducing price does not solve these issues.
It only hides them—temporarily.
Strong operators understand this:
Price is not the first lever to pull. It is the last to protect.
Because once price integrity is lost:
The most disciplined hotels do not ask:
“How low should we go?”
They ask:
“How do we sell more—without breaking our price?”
And that question makes all the difference.
